T
This piece is part of The D.C. Brief, TIME’s newsletter focusing on politics. Subscribe
here
to receive similar updates directly in your inbox.
On Friday, the Senate made significant strides to avert a government shutdown, effectively ceding spending authority to President Donald Trump and relegating Congress to a mere advisory role. This move has ignited fury among the Democratic base, signaling a considerable retreat for the party.
The frustration among Democrats is primarily aimed at Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer from New York, who had stated just a day before that the battle was over and it was time to move on. The choice was clear: keep the government running in a limited capacity or risk a complete shutdown, and the outcome speaks volumes.
However, this does not suggest that party members were content with the result.
When questioned about the need for new leadership among Senate Democrats, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries declined to endorse Schumer, curtly responding, “Next question.” Conversations have emerged regarding the potential of challenging Schumer in the upcoming 2028 primary.
On that day, nine Senate Democrats, along with Independent Angus King from Maine, aligned with nearly all Senate Republicans to prevent a government shutdown. The temporary spending bill provides the White House greater flexibility to close down various federal operations and eliminate thousands of jobs. Consequently, Congress, at least until September 30, is effectively granting the executive branch considerable latitude regarding the allocation of funds.
This decision marked a disappointing conclusion to a tumultuous week for Democrats. Amid chaotic developments from the Trump administration, including new executive orders, personnel changes, and tariffs, they faced the imminent threat of a government shutdown. House Republicans advanced a spending plan that many Democrats found particularly egregious due to its cuts impacting the District of Columbia. Afterward, the House departed, leaving the Senate without an opportunity to amend the budget. Schumer initially claimed that the proposed framework lacked sufficient support, only to change his stance the following day and back the spending plan to avoid a shutdown.
The sudden transition from a shutdown mentality to a compromise approach further fueled the dissatisfaction many Democrats felt towards their leadership.
“Whatever will be, will be,” remarked Senator Sheldon Whitehouse from Rhode Island, who voted against the plan and used the lead-up to the vote to express a sense of grim acceptance.
This feeling of resignation has been palpable in Washington in recent weeks. The discord among various anti-Trump factions has lessened as Trump’s assertive control over the budgetary process seemed increasingly inevitable. The victorious atmosphere in the White House, combined with the antics surrounding its pet-project DOGE, has only intensified the frustrations of Democrats striving to uphold the integrity of federal operations.
Ultimately, the Democrats positioned to counter Trump and his Republican allies capitulated. Although the GOP holds majorities in both the House and Senate, as well as the presidency, Senate rules require 60 votes to initiate proceedings, and Republicans only had 52 affirmative votes in the Upper Chamber. This necessitated GOP lawmakers to garner eight Democratic votes to advance their agenda.
Senate Democrats assessed the numbers, polling data, and their own capabilities. They reached the conclusion that their desire to oppose Trump’s sweeping authority did not align with their ability to do so effectively. Political scientists often emphasize that true power lies where will and capacity intersect. Democrats had the capacity to initiate a government shutdown but lacked the means to convincingly assign blame to Republicans or present a unified strategy for reopening the government under more favorable terms.
The pressing question now is how Democrats navigate the situation surrounding Schumer. Currently, there is notable silence, but murmurs of discontent are rising regarding Schumer’s future as Minority Leader for the remainder of this term. Both progressive factions and the general party base are uneasy about this decision, and guiding the party through the turbulent waters leading up to 2026 is a significant challenge.
To clarify: Schumer’s position is not immediately at risk, and Democrats are not inclined to engage in a self-destructive power struggle similar to their House counterparts. Schumer makes decisions based on strategic assessments rather than impulsive choices. His agreement to prioritize keeping the government operational at the expense of legislative authority arose from a rational evaluation rather than recklessness. Nonetheless, this decision has its consequences, particularly regarding his standing among disenchanted Democrats who expect the opposition party to actively challenge an administration intent on undermining a government it clearly disdains.
For now, the government continues to function. However, the Democrats’ ability to counter Trump is noticeably diminished. Until Congress reassesses its approach, the legislative branch remains subordinate to the executive.
Stay updated on key developments in Washington.
Subscribe to the D.C. Brief newsletter
.
